@pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 months agoCommitsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1765arrow-down17
arrow-up1758arrow-down1imageCommitsh.itjust.works@pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-square@corsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months ago I’m kinda planning on teaching my team I’m not going to deal with their git issues for them. These two statements contradict each other.
minus-square@JustAnotherKay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 months agoI disagree. I don’t wanna deal with my coworkers work, so I’m teaching them to deal with it themselves. Not necessarily in the best way for them to do it, but in an easy way to teach and an easy way to get right
minus-square@Jesus_666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 months agoThat’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first. Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.
These two statements contradict each other.
I disagree. I don’t wanna deal with my coworkers work, so I’m teaching them to deal with it themselves. Not necessarily in the best way for them to do it, but in an easy way to teach and an easy way to get right
That’s why I’ll make damn sure they’ll make that second branch first.
Mind you, the most likely result is that I’ll still see branches with 50+ commits with meaningless names because nobody ever rebases anything.