Tony Bark to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoWorld's smallest microcontroller looks like I could easily accidentally inhale it but packs a genuine 32-bit Arm CPUwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1536arrow-down14
arrow-up1532arrow-down1external-linkWorld's smallest microcontroller looks like I could easily accidentally inhale it but packs a genuine 32-bit Arm CPUwww.pcgamer.comTony Bark to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-square@Flagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish32•1 month agoNanobots of 90’s sci-fi, here we finally come!
minus-square@Dayroom7485@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish22•1 month agoI want those fuckers powering little submarines that fight cancer cells right now - but realistically speaking, these microcontrollers would need to be at least one order two order of magnitude smaller for that, no?
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 linkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-21 month agoJust reprogram viruses (like the microbe) instead. It’s easier.
minus-square@Flagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoOh, absolutely. I just mean that we appear to be headed in that direction.
minus-square@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoI can guarantee you they wouldn’t (solely) be used for pur benefit
Nanobots of 90’s sci-fi, here we finally come!
I want those fuckers powering little submarines that fight cancer cells right now - but realistically speaking, these microcontrollers would need to be at least one order two order of magnitude smaller for that, no?
Just reprogram viruses (like the microbe) instead. It’s easier.
Oh, absolutely. I just mean that we appear to be headed in that direction.
I can guarantee you they wouldn’t (solely) be used for pur benefit