• Lka1988
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Because there is legal precedent that says shareholders come first.

    You can blame Dodge for this. Yes, that Dodge.

    • @MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 day ago

      So to ensure that a company is more likely to be customer focused, rather than shareholder focused, it’s likely a good idea to only go for companies not listed on the american stock exchanges?

      • @Zacpod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 hours ago

        Yup. Same goes for being employed - if they’re publicly traded they’ll almost certainly treat their staff like absolute garbage.

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 day ago

        I mean, that’s my take. Also why you hear a lot of moaning and groaning from enthusiasts when a company who makes well-loved products decides to go public. Enshittification always occurs.

    • Too bad, that long-term users still kind of decide the fate of the company (as shareholders at some point realize that their share probably is not worth it).

      I’m really keen to see when this happens to Tesla, I’m thinking about shorting the stock, it’s so vastly overvalued, and there’s strong competition and sales are crashing everywhere (because of too much Nazi)

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        Too bad, that long-term users still kind of decide the fate of the company (as shareholders at some point realize that their share probably is not worth it).

        Yeah, that’s really the kicker, isn’t it? Legally beholden to the shareholders who demand short term profits forever and ever, risking the loss of long-term customers.

        It’s a guaranteed death.