It’s not objectively true that Trump was voted out of office in 2020 and remained out of office until 2024? Forget fascism, you can’t even agree on objective reality. Get a grip.
Nothing in the world is permanent champ. Voting blue stopped him for 4 years, not voting blue broke the streak and brought him back. My strategy stopped him for a while, yours invited him back in. I have no idea why you would think that’s an endorsement of your strategy. It definitively proves that my way is effective, and yours wasn’t.
And not voting Dem was going to change that, how exactly? Where I’m sitting, it looks like you saw all that indirect power and thought “He should have the power of the executive too :)”.
It’s like saying “Hey, that sandwich doesn’t have every single necessary nutrient in it, might as well eat fishtank gravel instead”. My strategy being limited in scope doesn’t make yours any less impotent.
Much like chemo, it is not a one and done solution. Guess what happens when you throw a tantrum and start skipping chemo sessions?
this is grasping at straws. please get in touch with reality.
It’s objectively true that he was out of office 2020-2024.
it’s not. what’s objectively true is that he has not been stopped, no matter how hard you vote.
It’s not objectively true that Trump was voted out of office in 2020 and remained out of office until 2024? Forget fascism, you can’t even agree on objective reality. Get a grip.
that didn’t stop him.
Nothing in the world is permanent champ. Voting blue stopped him for 4 years, not voting blue broke the streak and brought him back. My strategy stopped him for a while, yours invited him back in. I have no idea why you would think that’s an endorsement of your strategy. It definitively proves that my way is effective, and yours wasn’t.
I haven’t endorsed any strategy, have I? I’m saying yours is ineffective
It’s presently the most effective. It being imperfect doesn’t mean it isn’t better than every suggested alternative.
Even during that time he wasn’t stopped. he was still pulling the strings in Congress. he was still shaping the national narrative.
And not voting Dem was going to change that, how exactly? Where I’m sitting, it looks like you saw all that indirect power and thought “He should have the power of the executive too :)”.
It’s like saying “Hey, that sandwich doesn’t have every single necessary nutrient in it, might as well eat fishtank gravel instead”. My strategy being limited in scope doesn’t make yours any less impotent.