But this statement is about people. Not society. It kind of puts those boubdaries on how you define society. Has to be a thing that’s for people and the earth.
I have had some extremely terse disagreements with people who pretty much agreed with me down to like five adjectives/significant figures, as pillow talk, even. Shit happens, especially when youre doing the kind of vivid and visceral imagining a better world you do as you work to make it; i know it soubds like sort of a cop-out, but there really is nothing like it.
But i can work with pretty much any if it, if the foundation is ‘i care about people and/or the planet’.
But i can work with pretty much any if it, if the foundation is ‘i care about people and/or the planet’.
For sure I can work with them too, but we have to be ready to have these debates and work through these issues. My point is that good vibes are not enough to do good politics. Of course, people with good vibes are going to be much more agreeable to anarchist ideas, and any debates we do have will be more productive than people with bad vibes. But we still need to have clear ideas and good praxis with a solid logical and historical basis.
Perfectly reasonable. I don’t disagree with that. But we still need to prepare for the day when disclosing that coherent worldview is needed. And more importantly: a coherent anarchist worldview can inform what you give to the movements you contribute to, and you can give an honest justification for why.
But this statement is about people. Not society. It kind of puts those boubdaries on how you define society. Has to be a thing that’s for people and the earth.
I have had some extremely terse disagreements with people who pretty much agreed with me down to like five adjectives/significant figures, as pillow talk, even. Shit happens, especially when youre doing the kind of vivid and visceral imagining a better world you do as you work to make it; i know it soubds like sort of a cop-out, but there really is nothing like it.
But i can work with pretty much any if it, if the foundation is ‘i care about people and/or the planet’.
For sure I can work with them too, but we have to be ready to have these debates and work through these issues. My point is that good vibes are not enough to do good politics. Of course, people with good vibes are going to be much more agreeable to anarchist ideas, and any debates we do have will be more productive than people with bad vibes. But we still need to have clear ideas and good praxis with a solid logical and historical basis.
I can still work with people i disagree with. You’re being too online; it’s not 1917.
Me too 1000%. All the more reason why we need to come up with our own coherent worldview 😁
Im not going to communucate every single thing i believe to everyone who asks. Thats absurd. Hell i barely tell people i actually like much if it.
Perfectly reasonable. I don’t disagree with that. But we still need to prepare for the day when disclosing that coherent worldview is needed. And more importantly: a coherent anarchist worldview can inform what you give to the movements you contribute to, and you can give an honest justification for why.