@BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 2 days agoPiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1340arrow-down113
arrow-up1327arrow-down1imagePiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.com@BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 2 days agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-square@starman@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day agoYeah, I’ve read this webpage, it’s in your profile. It seems to refer to plurality as DID, for example in the #myths section.
minus-squareLime Buzz (fae/she)linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 day agoIt also says: “There have been no such studies done on non-clinical plurality yet, but interest has been growing in the field.” It is also saying that DID is one type of plurality, it is not calling it the only type. Not all of us have the clinical/medical type of plurality, DID, OSDD etc etc. If you’re genuinely interested then: https://pluralpedia.org/ explains many more types. Especially this page, gives a basic starter: https://pluralpedia.org/w/Plurality
Yeah, I’ve read this webpage, it’s in your profile. It seems to refer to plurality as DID, for example in the
#mythssection.It also says: “There have been no such studies done on non-clinical plurality yet, but interest has been growing in the field.”
It is also saying that DID is one type of plurality, it is not calling it the only type.
Not all of us have the clinical/medical type of plurality, DID, OSDD etc etc.
If you’re genuinely interested then: https://pluralpedia.org/ explains many more types. Especially this page, gives a basic starter: https://pluralpedia.org/w/Plurality
Okay, thanks for explaining.
Sure thing!