@BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 days agoPiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down114
arrow-up1333arrow-down1imagePiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.com@BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-square@unhrpetby@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day ago You almost had the rest of the sentence there: That doesn’t change the contradiction.
minus-squareMordikanlinkfedilink1•1 day agoYou’re trying to argue without evidence (like I had provided). To summarize these exchange so far its: You giving some marketing crap you read from a VPN provider site on their multi-hop service. Someone pointing out that it is incorrect with evidence. You get mad and basically come back with “Nuh-uh!” Is there some evidence you’d like to provide or is it going to be another “nuh-uh!”?
minus-square@unhrpetby@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•12 hours ago You giving some marketing crap you read from a VPN provider site on their multi-hop service. I’m sorry, but that isn’t correct.
minus-square@unhrpetby@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 hours agoI’m unsure what evidence you are referring to.
minus-squareMordikanlinkfedilink1•9 hours ago Threat models differ. More hops can, from direct personal experience, make the difference in tracking Evidence, or it isn’t true.
That doesn’t change the contradiction.
You’re trying to argue without evidence (like I had provided). To summarize these exchange so far its:
Is there some evidence you’d like to provide or is it going to be another “nuh-uh!”?
I’m sorry, but that isn’t correct.
I’m sorry, but that isn’t evidence.
I’m unsure what evidence you are referring to.
Evidence, or it isn’t true.