• @dukemirage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1086 months ago

    Twitter must be the worst platform to hold discussions on ever conceived, even before it turned into a fascist echo chamber.

    • @popcar2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      416 months ago

      Microblogging has always sucked IMO. It’s always been more geared towards shouting your opinion and leaving, and it actively discourages any discussion by hiding reply threads and making it a nightmare to follow. Most people aren’t ready for this take, though…

    • fonix232
      link
      fedilink
      226 months ago

      The whole idea behind Twitter (character limits etc.) was obviously a bad idea from the moment texting became obsolete thanks to IM services.

      • NoSpotOfGround
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        You mean because Twitter is an SMS-based messaging app?.. The character limits are arbitrary, not a technical limitation. Which is why they doubled them at one point, I believe.

        The limits were meant to act as a micro-blogging enforcement measure, for micro attention spans.

        • fonix232
          link
          fedilink
          346 months ago

          Actually, no, the initial limit was precisely because of SMS character limits - Twitter in the first few years had an SMS gateway where you could send a text and it would be posted under your account.

          Obviously later on it was an arbitrarily kept limit, but the limit itself, even doubled, makes it a horrible platform for any kind of debate.

    • @Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      That’s like saying that a battleaxe is too unwieldy for cooking. Yes you are correct, but why the hell are you using a battleaxe for cooking?

      Use the right tools for the right job.

  • barnaclebutt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    946 months ago

    Seriously. They sent in a bug from a LucasArts game using a codec nobody uses anymore. You think that YouTube, Netflix, Instagram, anything with video, etc. would be a little more thankful considering their business is based on using FOSS codecs.

  • @skoberlink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    866 months ago

    …he had to keep explaining to his bosses that “They are not a vendor, there is no NDA, we have no leverage, your VP has refused to help fund them, and they could kill three major product lines tomorrow with an email.

    (Emphasis mine)

    Just chef’s kiss, I love it.

    Also, seems like a good time for one of my favorite relevant XKCD’s.

  • @spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Many in the FFmpeg community argue, with reason, that it is unreasonable for a trillion-dollar corporation like Google, which heavily relies on FFmpeg in its products, to shift the workload of fixing vulnerabilities to unpaid volunteers.

    Google may once have felt an obligation to support the open source software they rely on, but that day’s long gone. They have become nothing more than a skeleton of distilled capitalism, shedding any pretense of being of benefit to society along with their “Don’t be evil” motto.

    Google’s behavior makes perfect sense with the understanding that every single move, no matter how small, is only about generating more revenue.

  • @ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -486 months ago

    I dunno who bothers to file bug reports with them. They’ll gaslight then get bitchy if that doesn’t work, and only then will they admit under sufferance that there may well be a flaw in their beautiful sexy code.