• @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    413 months ago

    Yes, so not only are they doing something shady, they’re doing something shady and exposing your data to anyone wanting to snoop it. What’s dumb about criticising the latter part?

    • @cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      253 months ago

      The fact that anyone thinks they have any semblance of privacy when typing into an online AI chatbot is saddening.

      Of course anything you type into a externally hosted AI is going to be harvested and sold.

      But sure, in this case you are also potentially exposing your queries to your ISP or someone listening on your local network too.

        • @cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -43 months ago

          Sure, it’s not a bad thing and it should be standard practice, but to act like encrypted traffic guarantees privacy is silly.

          • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The thing is that with the traffic unencrypted it opens the door to all sorts of attacks on that traffic.

            It’s not just privacy.

            If you can intercept and interpret you have the ability to replace as well.

            This is the integrity of your data

          • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            83 months ago

            Tell me where in this thread are anyone expecting privacy from any online LLM service, or anyone saying encrypted traffic guarantees privacy?

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        193 months ago

        Privacy is not the same as security